Douglas Diekema: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
KKeine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
K REFjournal uses <init> key; merged REFs |
||
| Zeile 22: | Zeile 22: | ||
|last=Bristol | |last=Bristol | ||
|first=Nellie | |first=Nellie | ||
|init=N | |||
|date=2011-11-26 | |date=2011-11-26 | ||
|title=Male circumcision debate flares in the USA | |title=Male circumcision debate flares in the USA | ||
| Zeile 45: | Zeile 46: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
He caused controversy by advocating a ritual nick of the clitoris of young girls.<ref>{{ | He caused controversy by advocating a ritual nick of the clitoris of young girls.<ref name="SMH">{{REFnews | ||
|last=Mann | |last=Mann | ||
|first=Simon | |first=Simon | ||
|init=S | |||
|date=2010-05-22 | |date=2010-05-22 | ||
|title=Support for female circumcision stirs controversy in the US | |title=Support for female circumcision stirs controversy in the US | ||
| | |publisher=The Sydney Morning Herald | ||
|url=http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/support-for-female-circumcision-stirs-controversy-in-us-20100521-w1uz.html#ixzz1tnUUz3jg | |url=http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/support-for-female-circumcision-stirs-controversy-in-us-20100521-w1uz.html#ixzz1tnUUz3jg | ||
|DOI=10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61796-0 | |DOI=10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61796-0 | ||
|accessdate=2012-08-07 | |accessdate=2012-08-07 | ||
| Zeile 112: | Zeile 110: | ||
|Autor= | |Autor= | ||
|Quelle=The Sydney Morning Herald | |Quelle=The Sydney Morning Herald | ||
|ref=<ref | |ref=<ref name="SMH"/> | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Zeile 119: | Zeile 117: | ||
|Text=We’re talking about something far less extensive than the removal of foreskin in a male | |Text=We’re talking about something far less extensive than the removal of foreskin in a male | ||
|Autor= | |Autor= | ||
|Quelle= | |Quelle=Science Line | ||
|ref=<ref> | |ref=<ref>{{REFnews | ||
|url=http://scienceline.org/2010/07/under-debate-female-circumcision/ | |||
|publisher=Science Line | |||
|title=Under Debate: Female Circumcision | |||
|last=Bleicher | |||
|first=Ariel | |||
|date=2010-07-09 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Zeile 140: | Zeile 145: | ||
|Autor= | |Autor= | ||
|Quelle=The Washington Post | |Quelle=The Washington Post | ||
|ref=<ref> | |ref=<ref name="WPost">{{REFnews | ||
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-parenting/post/circumcision-and-why-pediatricians-are-offering-more-support/2012/08/27/1cdd5752-f06a-11e1-adc6-87dfa8eff430_blog.html | |||
|publisher=The Washington Post | |||
|title=Circumcision, and why pediatricians are offering more support | |||
|last=D'Arcy | |||
|first=Janice | |||
|date=2012-08-28 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Zeile 148: | Zeile 160: | ||
|Autor= | |Autor= | ||
|Quelle=Broward Palm Beach New Times | |Quelle=Broward Palm Beach New Times | ||
|ref=<ref> | |ref=<ref name="Broward">{{REFnews | ||
|url=http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2012/02/american_academy_of_pediatrics_circumcision.php | |||
|publisher=Broward Palm Beach New Times | |||
|title=American Academy of Pediatrics to Come Out More Strongly in Favor of Circumcision, Suggests Dr. Doug Diekema, Member of Task Force | |||
|last=Funcheon | |||
|first=Deirdra | |||
|date=2012-02-14 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Zeile 158: | Zeile 177: | ||
|Autor= | |Autor= | ||
|Quelle=Broward Palm Beach New Times | |Quelle=Broward Palm Beach New Times | ||
|ref=<ref | |ref=<ref name="Broward"/> | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Zeile 165: | Zeile 184: | ||
|Text=[...] a moderate group -- not pro, not anti. We're trying to uncover what's real here. | |Text=[...] a moderate group -- not pro, not anti. We're trying to uncover what's real here. | ||
|Autor= | |Autor= | ||
|Quelle= | |Quelle=Broward Palm Beach New Times | ||
|ref=<ref | |ref=<ref name="Broward"/> | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Zeile 174: | Zeile 193: | ||
|Autor= | |Autor= | ||
|Quelle=The Washington Post | |Quelle=The Washington Post | ||
|ref=<ref | |ref=<ref name="WPost"/> | ||
}} | }} | ||