Daniel J. Krimsky: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K |
K |
||
| (Eine dazwischenliegende Version desselben Benutzers wird nicht angezeigt) | |||
| Zeile 8: | Zeile 8: | ||
'''Daniel J. Krimsky''' is a [[Mohel]] in the United States. In 2004 he amputated the glans of the penis of an 8 days old baby (known as LG) during a bris in Florida and attempted to conceal the damage. He was using a Mogen Clamp. The baby did not receive emergency care in time and suffered permanent disfigurement and loss of sexual function. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money.<ref>{{REFweb | '''Daniel J. Krimsky''' is a [[Mohel]] in the United States. In 2004 he amputated the glans of the penis of an 8 days old baby (known as LG) during a bris in Florida and attempted to conceal the damage. He was using a Mogen Clamp. The baby did not receive emergency care in time and suffered permanent disfigurement and loss of sexual function. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
| − | | quote= | + | |quote= |
| − | | url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2006/11/dont_let_your_mohel_use_a_moge_1.html | + | |url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2006/11/dont_let_your_mohel_use_a_moge_1.html |
| − | | title=Oy! Did You Hear the One About the Overzealous Mohel? | + | |title=Oy! Did You Hear the One About the Overzealous Mohel? |
| − | | last= | + | |last= |
| − | | first= | + | |first= |
| − | | publisher= | + | |publisher= |
| − | | work= | + | |work= |
| − | | date=2006-11-13 | + | |date=2006-11-13 |
| − | | accessdate=2012-10-14 | + | |accessdate=2012-10-14 |
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Zeile 23: | Zeile 23: | ||
Mogen was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the glans is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow apperture".<ref>{{REFweb | Mogen was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the glans is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow apperture".<ref>{{REFweb | ||
| − | | quote= | + | |quote= |
| − | | url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/circumcisedeo.pdf | + | |url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/circumcisedeo.pdf |
| − | | title=Complaint against Daniel J. Krimsky | + | |title=Complaint against Daniel J. Krimsky |
| − | | last= | + | |last= |
| − | | first= | + | |first= |
| − | | publisher= | + | |publisher= |
| − | | work= | + | |work= |
| − | | date=2006-10-30 | + | |date=2006-10-30 |
| − | | accessdate=2012-10-14 | + | |accessdate=2012-10-14 |
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the skin remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the skin of the shaft. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile shaft skin and perform a skin graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb | Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the skin remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the skin of the shaft. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile shaft skin and perform a skin graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
| − | | quote= | + | |quote= |
| − | | url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx | + | |url=http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20100625_0000608.ENY.htm/qx |
| − | | title=L.G. v. Mogen Circumcision Instruments | + | |title=L.G. v. Mogen Circumcision Instruments |
| − | | last= | + | |last= |
| − | | first= | + | |first= |
| − | | publisher= | + | |publisher= |
| − | | work= | + | |work= |
| − | | date=2020-06-25 | + | |date=2020-06-25 |
| − | | accessdate=2012-10-14 | + | |accessdate=2012-10-14 |
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was David J. Llewellyn.<ref>{{REFweb | U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was David J. Llewellyn.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
| − | | quote= | + | |quote= |
| − | | url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp | + | |url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MurasakiSunshine#Lawsuits_with_the_Mogen_clamp |
| − | | title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp | + | |title=Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp |
| − | | last= | + | |last= |
| − | | first= | + | |first= |
| − | | publisher= | + | |publisher= |
| − | | work= | + | |work= |
| − | | date= | + | |date= |
| − | | accessdate=2012-10-14 | + | |accessdate=2012-10-14 |
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Zeile 61: | Zeile 61: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Krimsky, Daniel}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Krimsky, Daniel}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Kategorie:Person]] | ||
| + | [[Kategorie:Männlich]] | ||
[[Kategorie:Mohel]] | [[Kategorie:Mohel]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Kategorie:Täter]] | [[Kategorie:Täter]] | ||
[[Kategorie:Von CircLeaks]] | [[Kategorie:Von CircLeaks]] | ||
[[Kategorie:Von IntactWiki]] | [[Kategorie:Von IntactWiki]] | ||
| − | |||
[[en:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | [[en:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 29. März 2020, 10:42 Uhr
(Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht aus dem Englischen übersetzt oder enthält noch englische Textpassagen. Bitte beziehe dich vorerst auf die Informationen im englischen Artikel. Klicke dazu in der IntactiWiki-Navigation im Abschnitt "In anderen Sprachen" auf "English".)
|
Daniel J. Krimsky is a Mohel in the United States. In 2004 he amputated the glans of the penis of an 8 days old baby (known as LG) during a bris in Florida and attempted to conceal the damage. He was using a Mogen Clamp. The baby did not receive emergency care in time and suffered permanent disfigurement and loss of sexual function. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money.[1]
Complaint
The complaint argued that Daniel J. Krimsky is not a doctor or medical practitioner. He presented himself as a "certified" mohel, in spite of not having the skill or training to perform circumcisions. Krimsky's attempt at hiding the damage was only uncovered by a physician present in the event.
Mogen was also named a defendant in this case for product liability, failure to warn and breach of warranty. The instructional brochure included with the clamp falsely stated that "No injury to the glans is possible because of beveled under edge and narrow apperture".[2]
Under general anesthesia, doctors re-covered the shaft with the skin remaining in the specimen and re-anastomosed the glans penis using a micro-surgical technique. However, the operation was not a complete success. Over the next two weeks, part of the glans became necrotic and black and was removed, including most of the skin of the shaft. As a result, L.G. no longer has a glans penis. When L.G. is older, it may be necessary to release the penile shaft skin and perform a skin graft in order for L.G. to have the best penile function possible under the circumstances. Although doctors project that L.G. will be able to have sexual intercourse and reproduce, the sexual experience will not be the same as if he had a glans penis.[3]
U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered that Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York be forced to pay $10.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages to L. G. and his parents, Dror Gerges and Sivan Gerges, in 2010. It is unknown if L. G. or his parents will ever collect on the judgement as Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York was already in default in 2010, after having been forced to pay a $7.5 million to a plaintiff from a 2007 lawsuit. Rabbi Krimsky agreed to pay the family an undisclosed amount of money. The plaintiffs' attorney was David J. Llewellyn.[4]
Einzelnachweise
- ↑
(13. November 2006). Oy! Did You Hear the One About the Overzealous Mohel?
. Abgerufen 14. Oktober 2012. - ↑ (30. Oktober 2006).
Complaint against Daniel J. Krimsky
. Abgerufen 14. Oktober 2012. - ↑ (25. Juni 2020).
L.G. v. Mogen Circumcision Instruments
. Abgerufen 14. Oktober 2012. - ↑
Lawsuits with the Mogen clamp
. Abgerufen 14. Oktober 2012.
