Brian D. Earp: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K |
K |
||
| Zeile 24: | Zeile 24: | ||
* [https://www.academia.edu/22022511/The_unbearable_asymmetry_of_bullshit The unbearable asymmetry of bullshit] | * [https://www.academia.edu/22022511/The_unbearable_asymmetry_of_bullshit The unbearable asymmetry of bullshit] | ||
* [https://www.academia.edu/13117940/Should_surgery_for_hypospadias_be_performed_before_an_age_of_consent Should surgery for hypospadias be performed before an age of consent?] mit [[Adrienne Carmack]] | * [https://www.academia.edu/13117940/Should_surgery_for_hypospadias_be_performed_before_an_age_of_consent Should surgery for hypospadias be performed before an age of consent?] mit [[Adrienne Carmack]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{LINKS}} | ||
| + | * [https://www.facebook.com/brian.earp1 Facebook-Profil] | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Earp}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Earp}} | ||
Version vom 16. Dezember 2018, 21:34 Uhr
Brian ist wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter im Bereich Wissenschaft und Ethik an der University of Oxford und Gastprofessor am Hastings Center Bioethics Research Institute. Seine Arbeit ist fächerübergreifend, nach einer Ausbildung in Kognitionswissenschaft, Psychologie, Philosophie, Geschichte und Soziologie von Wissenschaft und Medizin sowie Ethik. Er war Chefredakteur des Yale Philosophy Review sowie Gastredakteur des Journal of Medical Ethics (derzeit Mitherausgeber). Seine Arbeit als Wissenschaftler und Philosoph in wurde in "Nature", "New Scientist", "Popular Scientist", "New Humanist", "New York Magazine" und "The Atlantic" (und anderen Ausgaben) sowie in Print- oder Radio-Programmen von BBC, CNN, ABC und mehreren führenden internationalen Zeitungen veröffentlicht. Seine Arbeit wurde auch von der Präsidentenkommission für Bioethik in Graue-Substanz-Angelegenheiten zitiert: "Topics at the Intersection of Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society" (Themen an der Schnittstelle von Neurowissenschaften, Ethik und Gesellschaft).
Publikationen
- Female genital mutilation (FGM) and male circumcision: Should there be a separate ethical discourse?
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
- Does circumcision reduce penis sensitivity? The answer is not clear cut
- Boys and girls alike: The ethics of male and female "circumcision"
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- Between moral relativism and moral hypocrisy: Reframing the debate on "FGM"
- Female genital mutilation and male circumcision: Toward an autonomy-based ethical framework
- Circumcision of Male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: A critical assessment of recent evidence mit Morten Frisch
- The ethics of infant male circumcision
- The need to control for socially desirable responding in studies on the sexual effects of male circumcision
- Infant circumcision and adult penile sensitivity: Implications for sexual experience
- Male circumcision: Who should decide?
- Sex and circumcision
- Does science support infant circumcision?
- Do the benefits of male circumcision outweigh the risks? A critique of the proposed CDC guidelines
- Strengths and weaknesses in the 2015 Canadian Paediatric Society statement regarding newborn male circumcision
- The unbearable asymmetry of bullshit
- Should surgery for hypospadias be performed before an age of consent? mit Adrienne Carmack