Kanada - Versionsgeschichte

WikiAdmin: adjust wiki links

2022-03-22T13:57:34Z

adjust wiki links

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 22. März 2022, 13:57 Uhr
Zeile 76:		Zeile 76:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	Die [[Canadian ~~Pediatric~~ Society]] (CPS) veröffentlichte 1975 ihre erste Erklärung zur Beschneidung von Neugeborenen. Die Erklärung besagte: „Es gibt keine medizinische Indikation für die Beschneidung während der Neugeborenenzeit.“ Die CPS bezeichnete die Amputation als „obsolete Operation“ und rechnete mit einem „stärkeren Rückgang des Prozentsatzes beschnittener Säuglinge“.<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal		Die [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (CPS) veröffentlichte 1975 ihre erste Erklärung zur Beschneidung von Neugeborenen. Die Erklärung besagte: „Es gibt keine medizinische Indikation für die Beschneidung während der Neugeborenenzeit.“ Die CPS bezeichnete die Amputation als „obsolete Operation“ und rechnete mit einem „stärkeren Rückgang des Prozentsatzes beschnittener Säuglinge“.<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Swyer		\|last=Swyer
	\|init=PW		\|init=PW
Zeile 177:		Zeile 177:
	== Stellungnahmen medizinischer Fachgesellschaften ==		== Stellungnahmen medizinischer Fachgesellschaften ==

	=== Canadian ~~Pediatric~~ Society (CPS) ===		=== Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) ===

	Die [[Canadian ~~Pediatric~~ Society]] (CPS) nahm 1975 Stellung gegen die nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung von Jungen und erklärte, sie habe "keine medizinische Indikation" und sei eine "obsolete Operation".<ref name="cps1975"/>		Die [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (CPS) nahm 1975 Stellung gegen die nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung von Jungen und erklärte, sie habe "keine medizinische Indikation" und sei eine "obsolete Operation".<ref name="cps1975"/>

	Der CPS griff die Beschneidung 1996 erneut auf und empfahl:		Der CPS griff die Beschneidung 1996 erneut auf und empfahl:
Zeile 205:		Zeile 205:
	\|accessdate=2019-10-26		\|accessdate=2019-10-26
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
	\|Autor=[[Canadian ~~Pediatric~~ Society]] 1996		\|Autor=[[Canadian Paediatric Society]] 1996
	}}		}}

Zeile 211:		Zeile 211:

	{{Zitat		{{Zitat
	\|Text=Während es für einige Jungen in Hochrisikopopulationen und unter Umständen, in denen das Verfahren zur Verringerung oder Behandlung der Krankheit in Betracht gezogen werden könnte, einen Vorteil geben kann, empfiehlt die Canadian ~~Pediatric~~ Society nicht die routinemäßige Beschneidung jedes männlichen Neugeborenen.		\|Text=Während es für einige Jungen in Hochrisikopopulationen und unter Umständen, in denen das Verfahren zur Verringerung oder Behandlung der Krankheit in Betracht gezogen werden könnte, einen Vorteil geben kann, empfiehlt die Canadian Paediatric Society nicht die routinemäßige Beschneidung jedes männlichen Neugeborenen.
	\|ref=<ref name="cps2015">{{REFjournal		\|ref=<ref name="cps2015">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Sorokin		\|last=Sorokin
Zeile 238:		Zeile 238:
	\|accessdate=2019-10-26		\|accessdate=2019-10-26
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>
	\|Autor=[[Canadian ~~Pediatric~~ Society]] (2015)		\|Autor=[[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (2015)
	}}		}}

WikiAdmin: adjust wiki link

2022-03-22T13:52:48Z

adjust wiki link

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 22. März 2022, 13:52 Uhr
Zeile 8:		Zeile 8:
	Die nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung von Kindern ist nicht Teil der Kultur vieler kanadischer Minderheiten. Die französischsprachigen Einwohner von Quebec und anderswo befürworten im Allgemeinen keine Beschneidung. Die männliche Beschneidung ist nicht Teil der einheimischen Kultur der indigenen Inuit-, First Nations- und Métis-Bevölkerung (4,3 % der Bevölkerung).		Die nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung von Kindern ist nicht Teil der Kultur vieler kanadischer Minderheiten. Die französischsprachigen Einwohner von Quebec und anderswo befürworten im Allgemeinen keine Beschneidung. Die männliche Beschneidung ist nicht Teil der einheimischen Kultur der indigenen Inuit-, First Nations- und Métis-Bevölkerung (4,3 % der Bevölkerung).

	Die medizinisierte Genitalbeschneidung von Säuglingen und Kindern wurde zuerst in Kanada während der Mitte bis Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts von englischsprachigen Personen aufgrund der damaligen Mode des [[~~Großbritannien~~\|Vereinigten Königreichs]] gefördert. Ärzte empfahlen die Genitalbeschneidung sowohl bei männlichen als auch bei weiblichen Kindern, um Masturbation sowie verschiedene Krankheiten wie Epilepsie und Tuberkulose zu verhindern.<ref name="chhrp2018">{{REFdocument		Die medizinisierte Genitalbeschneidung von Säuglingen und Kindern wurde zuerst in Kanada während der Mitte bis Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts von englischsprachigen Personen aufgrund der damaligen Mode des [[Vereinigtes Königreich\|Vereinigten Königreichs]] gefördert. Ärzte empfahlen die Genitalbeschneidung sowohl bei männlichen als auch bei weiblichen Kindern, um Masturbation sowie verschiedene Krankheiten wie Epilepsie und Tuberkulose zu verhindern.<ref name="chhrp2018">{{REFdocument
	\|title=International NGO Council on Genital Autonomy Supplementary Country Report Submission on Canada to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child		\|title=International NGO Council on Genital Autonomy Supplementary Country Report Submission on Canada to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child
	\|url=http://chhrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Canada-Supplementary-Report.pdf		\|url=http://chhrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Canada-Supplementary-Report.pdf

WikiAdmin: translated

2022-03-22T13:46:47Z

translated

Änderungen zeigen

WikiAdmin: partly translated

2022-03-22T13:16:43Z

partly translated

Änderungen zeigen

WikiAdmin: partly translated

2022-03-22T13:01:52Z

partly translated

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 22. März 2022, 13:01 Uhr
Zeile 176:		Zeile 176:

	== Stellungnahmen medizinischer Fachgesellschaften ==		== Stellungnahmen medizinischer Fachgesellschaften ==

	=== Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) ===		=== Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) ===
	Die [[Canadian Pediatric Society]] (CPS) nahm 1975 Stellung gegen die nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung von Jungen und erklärte, sie habe "keine medizinische Indikation" und sei eine "obsolete Operation".<ref name="cps1975"/>		Die [[Canadian Pediatric Society]] (CPS) nahm 1975 Stellung gegen die nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung von Jungen und erklärte, sie habe "keine medizinische Indikation" und sei eine "obsolete Operation".<ref name="cps1975"/>
Zeile 292:		Zeile 293:
	}}		}}

	~~{{NYT en}}~~		== Verfügbarkeit der Kostenübernahme ==
	==~~Availability of third-party payment~~==		Kanada hat vierzehn Einzelzahler-Krankenversicherungspläne (HIP, ''health insurance plan'') – einen für jede der zehn Provinzen und drei Territorien und einen 14. Plan für Regierungsangestellte. Der HIP von British Columbia hörte in den 1980er Jahren auf, für nicht-therapeutische Beschneidungen zu zahlen. Der Ontario HIP stellte im Juli 1995 die Zahlung für nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung ein; Saskatchewan hörte 1996 auf. Nach und nach hörten alle anderen HIPs auf, für nicht-therapeutische Beschneidungen zu zahlen. Im Jahr 2006 war Manitoba HIP der letzte, der aufhörte, aber erst, nachdem der falsche Junge im [http://www.sbgh.mb.ca/ St. Boniface Hospital] beschnitten worden war.<ref>{{REFnews
	~~Canada has fourteen single~~-~~payer~~ health insurance ~~plans (HIPs~~) ~~— one for each of the ten provinces and three territories and a 14th plan for government employees~~. ~~The~~ British Columbia ~~HIP stopped paying for non~~-~~therapeutic circumcision in the 1980s~~. Ontario HIP ~~stopped payment for non~~-~~therapeutic circumcision in July 1995~~; Saskatchewan ~~stopped in~~ 1996. ~~One by one~~, ~~all other HIPs have stopped paying for non~~-~~therapeutic circumcision~~. In 2006, Manitoba HIP ~~was the last to stop~~, ~~but only after the wrong boy was circumcised at~~ [http://www.sbgh.mb.ca/ St. Boniface Hospital].<ref>{{REFnews
	\|title=Circumcision mix-up		\|title=Circumcision mix-up
	\|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/canadacom11-18-05/		\|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/canadacom11-18-05/
Zeile 303:		Zeile 303:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	[[~~Third-party payment~~]] ~~for non~~-~~therapeutic circumcision is not presently available anywhere~~ in ~~Canada~~.<ref name="jamesloewen2019">[[James Loewen]] (2019). ~~Personal communication~~.</ref> ~~Parents who wish to have a son circumcised must pay out-of-pocket for the costs of the circumcision~~.<ref name="rediger-muller2013">{{REFjournal		[[Kostenübernahme]] für nicht-therapeutische Beschneidung ist derzeit nirgendwo in Kanada verfügbar.<ref name="jamesloewen2019">[[James Loewen]] (2019). Persönliche Kommunikation.</ref> Eltern, die einen Sohn beschneiden lassen möchten, müssen die Kosten der Beschneidung aus eigener Tasche bezahlen.<ref name="rediger-muller2013">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Rediger		\|last=Rediger
	\|first=Chris		\|first=Chris
Zeile 328:		Zeile 328:
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

	==~~Reasons for circumcision~~==		== Gründe für Beschneidung ==
			Brown & Brown (1987) und Rediger & Muller (2013), die in Saskatoon arbeiteten, stellten fest, dass „die Beschneidungsraten bei männlichen Neugeborenen weiterhin stark vom Beschneidungsstatus des Kindesvaters beeinflusst werden“.<ref name="brown-brown1987">{{REFjournal
	Brown & Brown (1987) ~~and~~ Rediger & Muller (2013), ~~working~~ in Saskatoon, ~~found "newborn male circumcision rates continue to be heavily influenced by the circumcision status of the child's father~~."<ref name="brown-brown1987">{{REFjournal
	\|last=Brown		\|last=Brown
	\|first=Mark S.		\|first=Mark S.
Zeile 353:		Zeile 352:
	\|DOI=		\|DOI=
	\|accessdate=2019-11-10		\|accessdate=2019-11-10
	}}</ref> <ref name="rediger-muller2013"/>		}}</ref><ref name="rediger-muller2013"/>

	~~With the decline~~ in ~~the incidence of circumcision in Canada that started decades ago~~, ~~there are fewer and fewer circumcised fathers~~, so ~~one would expect the incidence of circumcision~~ in ~~Canada to continue to decline~~.		Dank des Rückgangs der Beschneidungshäufigkeit in Kanada, der vor Jahrzehnten begann, gibt es immer weniger beschnittene Väter, so dass man erwarten würde, dass die Beschneidungshäufigkeit in Kanada weiter zurückgeht.

			{{NYT en}}
	==Canadian circumcision deaths==		==Canadian circumcision deaths==

WikiAdmin: partly translated

2022-03-22T11:32:47Z

partly translated

Änderungen zeigen

WikiAdmin: created from English and partly translated

2022-03-22T09:30:19Z

created from English and partly translated

Neue Seite

{{NYT en}}
[[File:Flag_of_Canada.svg|thumb|150px|Flag of Canada]]
== Canada and circumcision ==

A report on non-therapeutic circumcision in Canada.

==History==

Non-therapeutic circumcision of children is not part of the culture of many Canadian minorities. The French-speaking people of Quebec and elsewhere generally do not favour circumcision. Male circumcision is not part of the native culture of indigenous Inuit, First Nations, and Métis populations (4.3% of the population).

The medicalized genital cutting of infants and children was first promoted in Canada during the mid to late 19th century by English-speakers after the fashion at the time of the [[United Kingdom]]. Doctors encouraged the genital cutting of both male and female children to prevent masturbation as well as various diseases like epilepsy and tuberculosis.<ref name="chhrp2018">{{REFdocument
|title=International NGO Council on Genital Autonomy Supplementary Country Report Submission on Canada to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child
|url=http://chhrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Canada-Supplementary-Report.pdf
|contribution=
|last=Antinuk
|first=Kira
|author-link=Kira Antinuk
|publisher=[[Children's Health & Human Rights Partnership]]
|format=PDF
|date=2018-07-11
|accessdate=2020-06-23
}}</ref>

Pirie (1927), in a presentation to the Canadian Society for the Study of Diseases of Children, described circumcision as "very common".<ref name="pirie1927">{{REFjournal
|last=Pirie
|first=George R.
|init=GR
|author-link=
|title=The story of circumcision
|journal=Can Med Assoc J
|date=1927-07
|volume=17
|issue=12
|pages=1540-2
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC407762/pdf/canmedaj00234-0126.pdf
|accessdate=2019-10-26
}}</ref>

[[Douglas Gairdner]]'s classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="gairdner1949">{{GairdnerDM 1949}}</ref> seems to have been ignored in Canada.

Bruce Peter Reimer, later known as [[David Reimer]], was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba on 22 August 1965. His penis was destroyed in an accident during medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision.

Patel (1966) reported his findings on neonatal [[circumcision]] in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Patel reported a complication rate of 55 percent experienced in a series of 100 consecutive male infant circumcisions. He also reported on the incidence of circumcision at [http://www.kingstonhsc.ca/ Kingston General Hospital] in Kingston, Ontario. Patel reported an incidence of circumcision of 48 percent. This is for one hospital in Kingston, ON but has been widely and falsely cited as the rate for all Canada.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Patel
|first=Hawa
|init=H
|author-link=
|title=The problem of routine infant circumcision
|journal=Can Med Assoc J
|date=1966
|volume=95
|issue=
|pages=576-81
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/patel/
|accessdate=2019-10-25
}}</ref>

Canada, like other English-speaking nations, formerly circumcised many of its boys, with circumcision rates in the 40 to 70 percent range in the 1960s.<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Wirth
|first=John L.
|init=JL
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Current circumcision practices: Canada
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
|date=1980
|volume=66
|issue=5
|pages=705-8
|url=https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/66/5/705
|quote=
|pubmedID=7432876
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-10-25
}}</ref>

The [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (CPS) issued its first statement on neonatal circumcision in 1975. The statement said "there is no medical indication for circumcision during the neonatal period." The CPS called the amputation an "obsolete operation" and anticipated a "sharper decrease in the percentage of infants circumcised".<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal
|last=Swyer
|init=PW
|author-link=
|last2=Boston
|init2=RW
|author2-link=
|etal=yes
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/cps1975/
|title=FN 75-01 Circumcision in the newborn period
|journal=Canadian Paediatric Society News Bulletin Supplement
|date=1975
|volume=88
|issue=2
|pages=1-2
|accessdate=2022-03-18
}}</ref>

LeBourdais (1995) declared that male circumcision is "clearly can no longer be regarded as routine procedure."<ref name="lebourdais1995">{{REFjournal
|last=LeBourdais
|first=Eleanor
|init=
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision no longer a "routine" surgical procedure.
|journal=Can Med Assoc J
|location=
|date=1995
|volume=152
|issue=11
|pages=1873-6
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1337997/pdf/cmaj00071-0145.pdf
|quote=
|pubmedID=7773907
|pubmedCID=1337997
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-11-04
}}</ref>

Dr. [[Arif Bhimji]] (2000) applied international [[human rights]] law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the practice of non-therapeutic child circumcision. He concluded:
<blockquote>
Circumcision of male infants is a clear violation of the rights guaranteed to all persons by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Furthermore, the practice contravenes human rights legislation on provincial and international levels.<ref name="bhimji2000">{{REFjournal
|last=Bhimji
|first=Arif
|init=A
|author-link=Arif Bhimji
|title=Infant Male Circumcision: A violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
|journal=Health Law in Canada Journal (HLCJ)
|date=2000-01
|volume=1
|issue=
|pages=1-33
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/Canada/court1/
|accessdate=2019-11-07
}}</ref>
</blockquote>

==Reported incidence of non-therapeutic child circumcision==

The reported incidence of child circumcision in Canada varies by province and has diminished over time. Newfoundland has always had a very low incidence of child circumcision while Alberta and Ontario have had a higher incidence of child circumcision.

Johnston (1995) reported that the incidence of child circumcision in Canada had fallen from 60 percent a generation ago to an estimated 25 percent.<ref name="johnston1995">{{REFnews
|title=Under the Knife
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/1995.09.11_TorontoStar/
|last=Johnston
|first=David
|coauthors=
|publisher=Toronto Star
|website=
|date=1995-09-11
|accessdate=2019-10-26
|quote=
}}</ref>

The Montreal ''Gazette'' (2006) reported that the incidence of circumcision has fallen by 36 percent to 14 percent according to the Association for Genital Integrity, while [https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/start Statistics Canada] (2006) reported a high of 29.5 percent in P.E.I. and a low of 1.1 percent in Nova Scotia.<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Rates of circumcision slashed in past 30 years.
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/2006-03-23montrealgazette/
|last=
|first=
|coauthors=
|publisher=The Gazette
|website=
|date=2006-03-23
|accessdate=2019-10-26
|quote=
}}</ref><ref>{{REFnews
|title=Circumcisions continue to drop: Province has second-lowest rate in the country
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/halifaxdailynews2006-03-25/
|last=MacDonald
|first=Andrea
|coauthors=
|publisher=Halifax Daily News
|website=
|date=2006-03-25
|accessdate=2019-10-26
|quote=
}}</ref>

==Position statements of medical societies==

The [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (CPS) took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".<ref name="cps1975" />

The CPS revisited circumcision in 1996 and recommended, "Circumcision should not be routinely performed."<ref name="chhrp2018" /><ref name="cps1996">{{REFjournal
|last=Outerbridge
|first=Eugene
|init=E
|author-link=
|etal=no
|title=Neonatal circumcision revisited
|journal=Can Med Assoc J
|location=
|date=1996-03-15
|volume=154
|issue=6
|pages=769-80
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1487803/pdf/cmaj00090-0027.pdf
|quote=
|pubmedID=8634956
|pubmedCID=1487803
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-10-26
}}</ref>

The [https://www.cpsbc.ca/ College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia] has issued three guidances for its members regarding non-therapeutic male circumcision of children. The most recent (2009) says in part:
<blockquote>
You are not obliged to act upon a request to circumcise an infant, but you must discuss the medical evidence and the current thoughts in bioethics that dissuade you from performing this procedure. You must also inform the parents that they have the right to see another physician.<ref>{{REFdocument
|title=Circumcision (Infant Male)
|trans-title=
|language=
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/cpsbc2009/cpsbc-circ-stmt2009.pdf
|contribution=
|quote=
|trans-quote=
|quote-lang=
|last=
|first=
|author-link=
|publisher=College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
|format=PDF
|date=2009-09
|accessdate=2019-11-18
}}</ref>
</blockquote>

The CPS again considered infant circumcision in 2015. The CPS stated:
<blockquote>While there may be a benefit for some boys in high-risk populations and circumstances where the procedure could be considered for disease reduction or treatment, the Canadian Paediatric Society does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male.<ref name="cps2015">{{REFjournal
|last=Sorokin
|first=S. Todd
|init=ST
|author-link=
|last2=Finlay
|init2=JC
|author2-link=
|last3=Jeffries
|init3=AL
|author3-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Newborn male circumcision
|journal=Paediatr Child Health
|location=
|date=2015-08
|volume=20
|issue=6
|pages=311-20
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578472/
|quote=
|pubmedID=26435672
|pubmedCID=4578472
|DOI=10.1093/pch/20.6.311
|accessdate=2019-10-26
}}</ref>
</blockquote>

The [[Canadian Urological Association]] (CUA) considered the matter of circumcision and issued a statement in February 2018. The CUA concluded: <blockquote>"Given the socioeconomic, educational status, and health demographics of our population, universal neonatal circumcision cannot be justified based on the current evidence available.<ref name="cua2018">{{REFjournal
|last=Dave
|first=Sumit
|init=S
|author-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version)
|journal=Can Urol Assoc J
|location=
|date=2018-02
|volume=12
|issue=2
|pages=18-28
|url=https://cuaj.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/5034/3470
|quote=
|pubmedID=29381455
|pubmedCID=5937397
|DOI=10.5489/cuaj.5034. Epub 2017 Dec 1
|accessdate=2019-10-26
}}</ref></blockquote>

==Availability of third-party payment==
Canada has fourteen single-payer health insurance plans (HIPs) — one for each of the ten provinces and three territories and a 14th plan for government employees. The British Columbia HIP stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the 1980s. Ontario HIP stopped payment for non-therapeutic circumcision in July 1995; Saskatchewan stopped in 1996. One by one, all other HIPs have stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision. In 2006, Manitoba HIP was the last to stop, but only after the wrong boy was circumcised at [http://www.sbgh.mb.ca/ St. Boniface Hospital].<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Circumcision mix-up
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/canadacom11-18-05/
|last=
|first=
|publisher=Canada.com
|accessdate=2019-10-26
}}</ref>

[[Third-party payment]] for non-therapeutic circumcision is not presently available anywhere in Canada.<ref name="jamesloewen2019">[[James Loewen]] (2019). Personal communication.</ref> Parents who wish to have a son circumcised must pay out-of-pocket for the costs of the circumcision.<ref name="rediger-muller2013">{{REFjournal
|last=Rediger
|first=Chris
|init=C
|author-link=
|last2=Muller
|first2=Andries J.
|init2=AJ
|author2-link=
|etal=no
|title=Parents' rationale for male circumcision
|journal=Can Fam Physician
|location=
|date=2013-02
|volume=59
|issue=2
|pages=e110-115
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576965/
|quote=
|pubmedID=23418252
|pubmedCID=3576965
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-10-26
}}</ref>

==Reasons for circumcision==

Brown & Brown (1987) and Rediger & Muller (2013), working in Saskatoon, found "newborn male circumcision rates continue to be heavily influenced by the circumcision status of the child's father."<ref name="brown-brown1987">{{REFjournal
|last=Brown
|first=Mark S.
|init=MS
|author-link=
|last2=Brown
|first2=Cheryl A.
|init2=CA
|author2-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision Decision: Prominence of Social Concerns
|journal=Pediatrics
|location=
|date=1987-08
|volume=80
|issue=2
|pages=215-219
|url=https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/80/2/215?
|quote=
|pubmedID=3615091
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-11-10
}}</ref> <ref name="rediger-muller2013"/>

With the decline in the incidence of circumcision in Canada that started decades ago, there are fewer and fewer circumcised fathers, so one would expect the incidence of circumcision in Canada to continue to decline.

==Canadian circumcision deaths==

Various deaths caused by circumcision have been reported in Canada, one in British Columbia and two in Ontario. There may be others because [[death]] by circumcision may not be properly reported.

* Chino Burrell: 7-months-old, [[Fatalities| death by circumcision]], [https://www.sickkids.ca/ Hospital for Sick Children], Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 9, 1974.
* {{REFweb
|url=http://www.circumstitions.com/death-exsang.html
|title=Ryleigh McWillis - death from blood loss
|last=Newell
|first=T.E.C.
|author-link=
|publisher=British Columbia Coroner's Service
|website=
|date=2002-08-22
|accessdate=2019-10-26
|format=
|quote=
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Cairns
|init=J
|author-link=
|etal=yes
|title=Circumcision: A minor procedure?
|journal=Paediatr Child Health
|location=
|date=2007-04
|volume=12
|issue=4
|pages=311-2
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2528673/
|quote=
|pubmedID=19030377
|pubmedCID=2528673
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-10-27
}}
* {{REFnews
|title=Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcised
|url=https://nationalpost.com/health/ontario-newborn-bleeds-to-death-after-family-doctor-persuades-parents-to-get-him-circumcised
|last=Blackwell
|first=Tom
|coauthors=
|publisher=National Post
|website=
|date=2015-10-25
|accessdate=219-11-16
|quote=
}}

See also: [[Fatalities]].

==Non-therapeutic circumcision and Canadian law==

Non-therapeutic circumcision of children in Canada is a practice that is of uncertain lawfulness.

The ''Charter of Rights and Freedoms'' (1982), [https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/how-rights-protected/guide-canadian-charter-rights-freedoms.html#a2e Article 7] provides every Canadian with the right to security of the person.<ref name="chhrp2018" />

In addition, Canada is a state-party to the United Nations ''[https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]'' (1966) and the ''[https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx Convention on the Rights of the Child]'' (1989), both of which provide various [[human rights]] to children, which are violated by non-therapeutic child circumcision.

[[Margaret A. Somerville]], then Director of the [https://www.mcgill.ca/study/2010-2011/faculties/law/information/law_centre_for_medicine_ethics_and_law McGill Centre for Medicine, Ethics and Law], wrote to Pierre Blais in 1993, then Minister for Justice and Attorney-General, to propose that "male circumcision would not be totally banned. Rather circumcision of those persons unable to consent for themselves (which would, of course, include all infants) would not be allowed under the Criminal Code as it presently stands." However, no action was taken.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/Canada/Somerville-Blais/
|title=Letter to Pierre Blais, Minister of Justice
|last=Somerville
|first=Margaret
|author-link=Margaret A. Somerville
|publisher=
|website=
|date=1993-01-28
|accessdate=2019-11-04
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref>

Several decisions of the [https://www.scc-csc.ca/home-accueil/index-eng.aspx Supreme Court of Canada] call consent for non-therapeutic circumcision of a child into question, but no case so far has ruled on the matter of circumcision.

[[Suzanne Bouclin]] (2005) has examined the issues and concluded:
<blockquote>
Where a parent or substitute decision maker has deemed that it is in the child’s best interest to undergo a treatment, there may be some conflict between that privilege and the fundamental right to security of the person protected under Section 7 of the Charter. Because the State’s power to intervene is broad and can be permanent, parental decision making has been protected under the Charter. Nevertheless, the Court has determined that parents’ rights are not absolute and that the State will intervene when necessity is demonstrated.

Section 7 of the Charter provides everyone with a certain degree of autonomy in decisions concerning their private lives, including those concerning medical treatment. The protection of the security of the person is so fundamental that medical treatment administered without a patient’s informed consent may amount to battery. In the context of circumcision, if a medical practitioner performs routine neonatal circumcision without an infant’s parental consent, that practitioner may be liable for criminal assault as well as for damages for any harm that resulted from her or his negligence ([[Margaret A. Somerville|Somerville]], 2000).

Given that a portion of the medical community has agreed that routine male circumcision is nontherapeutic and that it may be in and of itself be a harmful practice, it is arguable that when performed on neonates for nontherapeutic reasons, it amounts to a violation of the child’s [https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art7.html Section 7] rights. As stated at the [[Declaration of the First International Symposium on Circumcision (1989)| Declaration of the First International Symposium on Circumcision]], “parents and/or guardians do not have the right to consent to the surgical removal or modification of their children’s normal genitalia.” The Declaration adds that the only person who may consent to medically unnecessary procedures upon herself or himself is that individual, having reached a stage in life where she or he can consent and only upon being fully informed about the risks and benefits of the procedure. Note, however, that the Declaration is not a binding legal instrument.

'''…'''
Public awareness is increasing, as evidenced by the numerous parents, health practitioners, children’s rights activists, ethicists, lawyers, and concerned citizens who have voiced their opinion. Insofar as male circumcision is the removal of healthy erogenous flesh without medical purpose and without the consent of the child and given that it is a painful procedure, neonatal circumcision is unnecessary and may well violate a child’s bodily integrity.<ref name="bouclin2005">{{REFjournal
|last=Bouclin
|first=Suzanne
|init=S
|author-link=Suzanne Bouclin
|etal=no
|title=An examination of legal and ethical issues surrounding male circumcision: the Canadian context
|journal=Int J Mens Health
|location=
|date=2005
|volume=4
|issue=3
|pages=205-23
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/Canada/bouclin2005/
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|accessdate=2019-10-27
}}</ref></blockquote>

===Canadian Medical Association Code of Ethics and Professionalism===
The CMA code has two statements relevant to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male infants:
* Never participate in or support practices that violate basic human rights.
* Never participate in or condone the practice of torture or any form of cruel, inhuman, or degrading procedure.<ref name="cma2018">{{REFdocument
|title=CMA Code of Ethics and Professionalism
|url=https://policybase.cma.ca/en/viewer?file=%2fdocuments%2fPolicyPDF%2fPD19-03.pdf#phrase=false
|contribution=
|last=
|first=
|publisher=Canadian Medical Association
|format=
|date=2018
|accessdate=2021-07-08
}}</ref>

===Lawsuit===

The ''New York Post'' (2019) reports that a Canadian woman of African ancestry took her nine-day-old son to the [https://www.vemcregina.com/ Victoria East Medical Clinic] in Regina, SK to be circumcised. In the course of the circumcision, the tip of his penis was allegedly cut off. An ambulance was called but the [http://www.rqhealth.ca/facilities/regina-general-hospital Regina General Hospital] was unable to reattach the severed part.

The family has retained [https://ca.linkedin.com/in/kolade-oladokun-llb-llm-bl-827886114 Kolade Oladokun] who has filed a lawsuit.<ref>{{REFnews
|title= Canadian woman sues after tip of son’s penis cut off in circumcision
|url=https://nypost.com/2019/08/19/canadian-woman-sues-after-tip-of-sons-penis-cut-off-in-circumcision/
|last=Steinbuch
|first=Yaron
|coauthors=
|publisher=New York Post
|website=
|date=2019-08-19
|accessdate=2020-06-16
|quote=
}}</ref>

==Canada and circumcision in the 21st century==

Jackie Smith (2002) discussed the growing consensus against non-therapeutic child circumcision.<ref name="smith2002">{{REFnews
|title=The growing consensus against circumcision
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/nationalpost08-30-02a/
|last=Smith
|first=Jackie
|coauthors=
|publisher=National Post
|website=
|date=2002-08-30
|accessdate=2019-10-27
|quote=
}}</ref>

At the beginning of the 21st Century, only the Manitoba Health Insurance Plan (HIP) still paid for non-therapeutic circumcision, however that was ended in 2006.

Saskatchewan had an incidence of circumcision in 2000 and 2001 of 27.6 percent. The Saskatchewan College of Physicians and Surgeons said in 2002 that was much too high and should be reduced substantially. The Registrar, Dr. Dennis Kimble, said, "they [doctors] aren't required to carry out a procedure simply because parents want it done."<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Sask. college wants circumcision rates reduced
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/medicalpost03-18-02/
|last=Driver
|first=Deana
|coauthors=
|publisher=Medical Post
|website=
|date=2002-03-19
|accessdate=2021-07-22
|quote=
}}</ref>

The [https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health.html Public Health Agency of Canada] carried out a survey of mothers' birth experiences in 2006-7. Item 38 was male infant non-therapeutic circumcision. (See pages 224-5.)
<blockquote>
Among women with a male baby, 31.9% (95% CI: 30.3–33.6) reported circumcising their baby. There was marked regional variation in circumcision. In the 10 jurisdictions in which at least five circumcisions were reported, the proportion of women who reported having their male baby circumcised ranged from 44.3% (95% CI: 39.2–49.4) in Alberta and 43.7% (95% CI: 40.6–46.8) in Ontario to 9.7%† (95% CI: 5.2–14.2) in the Northwest Territories and 6.8%† (95% CI: 3.6–10.0) in Nova Scotia.<ref>{{REFdocument
|title=What Mothers Say: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey
|url=https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/migration/phac-aspc/rhs-ssg/pdf/survey-eng.pdf
|contribution=
|last=
|first=
|publisher=Public Health Agency of Canada
|format=PDF
|date=2009
|accessdate=2019-10-27
}}</ref>
</blockquote>

In all provinces and territories, only a minority of boys are being circumcised. The incidence of circumcision in Labrador and Newfoundland is reported to be close to zero.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://momlovesbest.com/choosing-circumcision
|title=Circumcision: Pros and Cons
|last=Goodwin
|first=Caitlin
|author-link=
|publisher=
|website=MomLovesBest
|date=2019-05-06
|accessdate=2021-07-10
|format=
|quote=Labrador and Newfoundland have close to zero
}}</ref>

The above referenced survey provides the most recent available statistics on the incidence of non-therapeutic child circumcision in Canada. It is likely that the incidence of circumcision has further declined since the survey was taken for the following reasons:

* The long-term trend in the incidence of circumcision in Canada is down.

* The health insurance plans (HIPs) do not support non-therapeutic circumcision.

* The ratio of intact fathers to circumcised fathers is changing toward more intact fathers and fewer circumcised fathers. Boys who were born after the decline in circumcision started and who are intact are now reaching the age at which they start families and become fathers. Intact men usually do not want any son to be circumcised, so they will usually not have a son circumcised.<ref name="rediger-muller2013" /> This will cause a further decline in the incidence of circumcision.

* The survey found that the incidence of circumcision on Prince Edward Island was 38 percent. A recent report indicated that non-therapeutic circumcision of boys is no longer available on P.E.I. because no practitioner will perform the non-therapeutic [[amputation]] of part of a boy's penis.<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Mom 'enraged' she can't find doctor to perform circumcision on P.E.I.
|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/p-e-i-no-doctors-circumcision-1.5187284
|last=Williams
|first=Nicole
|coauthors=
|publisher=CBC News
|website=
|date=2019-06-24
|accessdate=2019-10-27
|quote=
}}</ref>

* Most hospitals do not provide non-therapeutic circumcision, however [https://www.wrh.on.ca/ Windsor Regional Hospital] is an exception to the general rule. Windsor Regional Hospital still promotes medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] to parents of normal, healthy male infants in apparent violation of the infants' [https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art7.html Section 7 rights]. The hospital is reported to circumcise 51 percent of boys born in the hospital. This is far higher than the incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision elsewhere in Ontario and Canada.<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Circumcisions spark debate
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/windsorstar03-19-05/
|last=Williamson
|first=Doug
|coauthors=
|publisher=Windsor Star
|website=
|date=2005-03-19
|accessdate=2021-07-22
|quote=Dr. Tony Hammer, a Windsor family doctor, said his colleagues may be performing the medically unnecessary procedure simply to make a buck. <b>…</b> There is a financial incentive for physicians, and I wonder if they are fully informing their patients of a lack of medical need.
}}</ref>

DeMaria et al. (2013) surveyed physicians in southwest Ontario who still perform circumcisions. They concluded from their survey:
<blockquote>Our survey findings indicate that most physicians performing neonatal circumcisions in our community have received informal and unstructured training. This lack of formal instruction may explain the complications and unsatisfactory results witnessed in our pediatric urology practice. Many practitioners are not aware of the contraindications to neonatal circumcision and most non-surgeons perform the procedure without being able to handle common post-surgical complications.<ref name="demaria2013">
{{REFjournal
|last=De Maria
|first=
|init=J
|author-link=
|last2=Abdulla
|first2=
|init2=A
|author2-link=
|last3=Pemberton
|first3=
|init3=J
|author3-link=
|last4=Roees
|first4=
|init4=A
|author4-link=
|last5=Braga
|first5=
|init5=LH
|author5-link=
|etal=no
|title=Are Physicians Performing Neonatal Circumcisions Well Trained?
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Can Urol Assoc J
|location=
|date=2013
|volume=7
|issue=7-8
|article=
|page=260-4
|pages=
|url=https://cuaj.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/200
|pubmedID=24032062
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.200
|accessdate=2021-06-24
}}</ref></blockquote>

As of 2022, [[third-party payment]] for non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] has not been available anywhere in Canada since 2006. Moreover, non-therapeutic circumcision is not done in most hospitals,<ref name="jamesloewen2019" /> so parents who want to have a boy circumcised must take the boy to the surgery of a practitioner who specializes in non-therapeutic male circumcision, and furthermore must pay out of pocket. For example, the cost of circumcision of a newborn boy in New Brunswick is C$425 ranging up to C$1500 for a teenager or adult.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://gentleproceduresnb.ca/circumcision/cost-how-much/
|title=Circumcision Pricing & Insurance Coverage
|publisher=Gentle Procedures Clinic
|accessdate=2019-11-06
}}</ref>

The prevalence of circumcision is higher among older males, but lower among younger males. As older, mostly circumcised males die and are replaced in the population by younger, mostly intact males, the overall prevalence of circumcised men in Canada is gradually declining. Intact males usually do not want any son to be circumcised,<ref name="brown-brown1987" /> <ref name="rediger-muller2013" /> so the demand for circumcision in Canada is declining.

Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, Canada (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were circumcised between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of [[HIV]] infection.<ref name="mayan2021">{{REFjournal
|last=Mayan
|first=Madhur
|init=
|author-link=
|last2=Hamilton
|first2=Robert J.
|init2=
|author2-link=
|last3=Juurlink
|first3=David N.
|init3=
|author3-link=
|last4=Austin
|first4=Peter C.
|init4=
|author4-link=
|last5=Jarvi
|first5=Keith A.
|init5=
|author5-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision and Risk of HIV Among Males From Ontario, Canada
|journal=J Urol
|location=
|date=2021-09-23
|volume=
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=
|url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|quote=We found that circumcision was not independently associated with the risk of acquiring [[HIV]] among men from Ontario, Canada.
|pubmedID=34551593
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
|accessdate=2021-10-02
}}</ref>

Schröder et al. (2021) reviewed the experience of the [https://www.sickkids.ca Hospital for Sick Children] in Toronto with regard to circumcision-related emergency admissions between 2000 and 2013. They found that 19 previously healthy neonates had emergency admissions for circumcision complications. The records of patients who had died were searched to identify those who had been circumcised.

Four of the boys had post-circumcision bleeding. Four of the boys had glans amputations. Two previously healthy boys died.<ref name="shroder2021">{{REFjournal
|last=Schröder
|first=Annette
|init=
|author-link=
|last2=Farhat
|first2=Walid A.
|init2=
|author2-link=
|last3=Chiasson
|first3=David
|init3=
|author3-link=
|last4=Wilson
|first4=Gregory J.
|init4=
|author4-link=
|last5=Koyle
|first5=Martin A.
|init5=
|author5-link=
|etal=no
|title=Serious and Fatal Complications after Neonatal Circumcision
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Eur Urol
|location=
|date=2021-12-12
|volume=29
|issue=
|article=
|page=
|pages=S2405-4569(21)00316-3
|url=https://www.eu-focus.europeanurology.com/article/S2405-4569(21)00316-3/fulltext
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=34973956
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1016/j.euf.2021.12.005
|accessdate=2022-01-15
}}</ref> Based on the data provided, the estimated death rate is one dead boy for every 84,000 circumcisions.

==Video==
[[Christopher Guest]], {{MD}}, {{FRCPC}}, of Barrie, ON, discusses circumcision in Canada:

<youtube>7-vbutOy4X8</youtube>

{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Canadian Children's Rights Council]]
* [[Circumcision]]
* [[Children’s Health & Human Rights Partnership]]
* [[Circumcision: The Whole Story]]
* [[Child Circumcision: Rites or Rights?]]
* [[Foreskin]]
* [[2020 USA & Canada Circumcision Crisis Protests]]

{{LINKS}}
* {{REFweb
|url=http://can-fap.net/
|title=Canadian Foreskin Awareness Project
|last=Callender
|first=Glen
|author-link=Glen Callender
|publisher=
|website=
|date=
|accessdate=2019-12-16
}}

{{ABBR}}
{{REF}}

[[Kategorie:Beschneidung]]
[[Kategorie:Männliche Beschneidung]]
[[Kategorie:Kanada]]
[[Kategorie:Klage]]
[[Kategorie:Statistik]]
[[Kategorie:Geschichte]]

[[en:Canada]]